Monday, November 24, 2014

Theology of the Body in Bite-Size Pieces, Part Twelve

We’ve established that male and female were created in God’s image, that as such they were created to yearn for each other and to be joined as one body in covenantal union, an icon of the inner life of the Holy Trinity, open to procreation of new life. Sacramental marriage reflects Jesus’ marriage with his bride, the Church, to whom he gives his body in love.

In his book Theology of the Body for Beginners Christopher West writes the following:

“Christ’s love seems distinguishable by four particular qualities. First, Christ gives his body freely (“No one takes my life from me, I lay it down of my own accord,” Jn 10:18). Second, he gives his body totally--without reservation, condition, or selfish calculation (“He loved them to the last,” Jn 13:1). Third, he gives his body faithfully (“I am with you always,” Mt 28:20). And fourth, he gives his body fruitfully (“I came that they may have life,” Jn 10:10). If men and women are to avoid the pitfalls of counterfeit love, and live their vocation to its full, their union must express the same free, total, faithful, fruitful love that Christ expresses.

“Ultimately all questions of sexual morality come down to one very simple question: Does this act truly image God’s free, total, faithful, fruitful love or does it not?”

Contraception does not image God’s free, total, faithful, fruitful love. It robs the sacred union of husband and wife of its inherent divine image.

There is nothing immoral about purposely avoiding pregnancy for legitimate reasons. (“We don’t want to be bothered with children” is not a legitimate reason. Serious financial difficulties, the emotional demands of other children, health concerns, these are legitimate reasons.) But using contraception is never morally licit. God built into the body his plan for married couples to conceive children as well as to avoid conception; faithfulness to the nuptial meaning of the body images and glorifies God, contraception, which is not faithful to this meaning, does not.

Many people ask “What’s the difference, really, between contraception and natural family planning? They both achieve the same end. The Church teaches that every sexual union of husband and wife must be open to procreation--but when a couple uses natural family planning they are also trying to avoid pregnancy, they’re having sex while not being open to procreation either! Isn’t this a hypocritical stance?”


There is a fundamental difference between contraception and natural family planning, and this difference is what we’ll explore next in this series.