Thursday, March 6, 2014

Mike Gendron Gets It Wrong...Again

When someone is so full of contempt for a certain group of people it often clouds their vision, causing them to see things that aren’t there and to miss what is right in front of them. Such is the case with Mike Gendron’s contempt for the Roman Catholic Church, and it is evident in everything he writes.
A case in point is a brief article in the recent newsletter from his “Proclaiming the Gospel” ministry. The article reads as follows:
“In an article published by Catholic News Agency entitled Mary, Mother of Saints, Mother of All, the author declares that both Mary and her iconography are omnipresent. The author writes: ‘While Mary gives unfailing sustenance, it is precisely her gentle omnipresence in our lives that can make us take her for granted.’ In another paragraph the author says, ‘Our heavenly mother listens and speaks to us, and comforts us in many guises. She is present to us under many names, such as Mother of Mercy, Mother of Help, Mother of Divine Grace, and many more. Her splendid iconography is omnipresent like the crucifix, her love shining forth through the radiance of her face. Yet her loving presence is always gentle. We know that she is always our last resort.’
Mike's comment: Catholics continue to distort their version of Mary by giving her attributes of God including: omnipresence, sinlessness, co-mediator and advocate. This is what happens when an apostate church denies the supreme authority of God's Word.”
To his credit, Gendron included a link to the article, so readers can see exactly what he misinterpreted and presented out of context.
The article was about abortion, and argued that the discussion on this topic focuses almost exclusively on the child, and does not also consider the mother. The first paragraph concludes with “However, maternal love seen as an absolute value must not be absent when addressing the tragedy of killing the unborn. For children to be safe from harm, nothing must come between mothers and their children.”
The next paragraph begins: “As Catholics, we have a special knowledge of what having a mother means.” It is in that context that the paragraph flows, ending with “We know that [Mary] is always our last resort.” The author is saying that Mary is our last resort in knowing what it means to be a mother, not that she is our last resort in all things.
Gendron writes: “Catholics continue to distort their version of Mary by giving her attributes of God including: omnipresence, sinlessness, co-mediator and advocate.”
Really?
To misconstrue this author’s meaning of “omnipresence” takes a very narrow and biased mind. “Her splendid iconography is omnipresent like the crucifix.” Does Gendron really think the author is attributing literal omnipresence to physical objects? The author is simply saying we can find icons of Mary almost everywhere, just as we can find crucifixes almost everywhere. To claim the author is using the word “omnipresence” in the same context we use it for God is ridiculous, grasping desperately for something to criticize.
To revisit that sentence in its entirety: “Her splendid iconography is omnipresent like the crucifix, her love shining forth through the radiance of her face.” Have you ever looked at a picture of a loved one and felt their love shining through their face? If so, are you raising the loved one to the level of an omnipresent deity, or are you claiming the picture is actually that person, or that it has some supernatural power to channel them? Or do you simply experience their love when reminded of them by an image?
Have you ever felt the presence of a loved one when they are not physically present to you? By looking at a picture of them, or by a gift they gave you, or anything else that reminds them of you?
If so, don’t let Mike Gendron find out, for he will accuse you of giving them attributes of God, such as omnipresence.
He thinks the sinlessness Catholics attribute to Mary is on the same level of God’s sinlessness. The difference is that God cannot sin; Mary could have, but never chose sin. She was created in the same state of original justice as Eve, with the same free will and the same choices, but did not abuse her gift of free will. (For more perspective on this, read my article “Immaculate Conception and Perpetual Virginity: Why Do They Strike Such a Nerve?”)
The Catholic Church does not teach that Mary is a co-mediator. For more on that read my article “Mary: Not Just an Ovum Donor.”
Does the Catholic Church call Mary “Advocate?” Yes. If you find that objectionable, read John 2:1-5, and come up with a better word.